Next: Processes and Threads, Previous: Decoding Output, Up: Output from Processes
Output from asynchronous subprocesses normally arrives only while Emacs is waiting for some sort of external event, such as elapsed time or terminal input. Occasionally it is useful in a Lisp program to explicitly permit output to arrive at a specific point, or even to wait until output arrives from a process.
This function allows Emacs to read pending output from processes. The output is given to their filter functions. If process is non-
nil
then this function does not return until some output has been received from process or process has closed the connection.The arguments seconds and millisec let you specify timeout periods. The former specifies a period measured in seconds and the latter specifies one measured in milliseconds. The two time periods thus specified are added together, and
accept-process-output
returns after that much time, even if there is no subprocess output.The argument millisec is obsolete (and should not be used), because seconds can be floating point to specify waiting a fractional number of seconds. If seconds is 0, the function accepts whatever output is pending but does not wait.
If process is a process, and the argument just-this-one is non-
nil
, only output from that process is handled, suspending output from other processes until some output has been received from that process or the timeout expires. If just-this-one is an integer, also inhibit running timers. This feature is generally not recommended, but may be necessary for specific applications, such as speech synthesis.The function
accept-process-output
returns non-nil
if it got output from process, or from any process if process isnil
; this can occur even after a process has exited if the corresponding connection contains buffered data. The function returnsnil
if the timeout expired or the connection was closed before output arrived.
If a connection from a process contains buffered data,
accept-process-output
can return non-nil
even after the
process has exited. Therefore, although the following loop:
;; This loop contains a bug. (while (process-live-p process) (accept-process-output process))
will often read all output from process, it has a race condition
and can miss some output if process-live-p
returns nil
while the connection still contains data. Better is to write the loop
like this:
(while (accept-process-output process))