Next: Key Binding Conventions, Up: Tips
Here are conventions that you should follow when writing Emacs Lisp code intended for widespread use:
This convention is mandatory for any file that includes custom definitions. If fixing such a file to follow this convention requires an incompatible change, go ahead and make the incompatible change; don't postpone it.
Occasionally, for a command name intended for users to use, it is more convenient if some words come before the package's name prefix. For example, it is our convention to have commands that list objects named as ‘list-something’, e.g., a package called ‘frob’ could have a command ‘list-frobs’, when its other global symbols begin with ‘frob-’. Also, constructs that define functions, variables, etc., work better if they start with ‘defun’ or ‘defvar’, so put the name prefix later on in the name.
This recommendation applies even to names for traditional Lisp
primitives that are not primitives in Emacs Lisp—such as
copy-list
. Believe it or not, there is more than one plausible
way to define copy-list
. Play it safe; append your name prefix
to produce a name like foo-copy-list
or mylib-copy-list
instead.
If you write a function that you think ought to be added to Emacs under
a certain name, such as twiddle-files
, don't call it by that name
in your program. Call it mylib-twiddle-files
in your program,
and send mail to ‘bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org’ suggesting we add
it to Emacs. If and when we do, we can change the name easily enough.
If one prefix is insufficient, your package can use two or three alternative common prefixes, so long as they make sense.
provide
at the end of each separate Lisp file.
See Named Features.
require
to make sure they are loaded.
See Named Features.
(eval-when-compile (require 'bar))
This tells Emacs to load bar just before byte-compiling
foo, so that the macro definition is available during
compilation. Using eval-when-compile
avoids loading bar
when the compiled version of foo is used. It should be
called before the first use of the macro in the file. See Compiling Macros.
require
that library at the top-level and be done
with it. But if your file contains several independent features, and
only one or two require the extra library, then consider putting
require
statements inside the relevant functions rather than at
the top-level. Or use autoload
statements to load the extra
library when needed. This way people who don't use those aspects of
your file do not need to load the extra library.
cl-lib
library
rather than the old cl
library. The latter does not
use a clean namespace (i.e., its definitions do not
start with a ‘cl-’ prefix). If your package loads cl
at
run time, that could cause name clashes for users who don't use that
package.
There is no problem with using the cl
package at compile
time, with (eval-when-compile (require 'cl))
. That's
sufficient for using the macros in the cl
package, because the
compiler expands them before generating the byte-code. It is still
better to use the more modern cl-lib
in this case, though.
framep
and frame-live-p
.
-unload-function
, where feature is the name
of the feature the package provides, and make it undo any such
changes. Using unload-feature
to unload the file will run this
function. See Unloading.
(defalias 'gnus-point-at-bol (if (fboundp 'point-at-bol) 'point-at-bol 'line-beginning-position))
eval-after-load
and with-eval-after-load
in
libraries and packages (see Hooks for Loading). This feature is
meant for personal customizations; using it in a Lisp program is
unclean, because it modifies the behavior of another Lisp file in a
way that's not visible in that file. This is an obstacle for
debugging, much like advising a function in the other package.
[1] The benefits of a Common Lisp-style package system are considered not to outweigh the costs.