Next: Association List Type, Previous: Box Diagrams, Up: Cons Cell Type
Dotted pair notation is a general syntax for cons cells that
represents the car and cdr explicitly. In this syntax,
(
a .
b)
stands for a cons cell whose car is
the object a and whose cdr is the object b. Dotted
pair notation is more general than list syntax because the cdr
does not have to be a list. However, it is more cumbersome in cases
where list syntax would work. In dotted pair notation, the list
‘(1 2 3)’ is written as ‘(1 . (2 . (3 . nil)))’. For
nil
-terminated lists, you can use either notation, but list
notation is usually clearer and more convenient. When printing a
list, the dotted pair notation is only used if the cdr of a cons
cell is not a list.
Here's an example using boxes to illustrate dotted pair notation.
This example shows the pair (rose . violet)
:
--- --- | | |--> violet --- --- | | --> rose
You can combine dotted pair notation with list notation to represent
conveniently a chain of cons cells with a non-nil
final cdr.
You write a dot after the last element of the list, followed by the
cdr of the final cons cell. For example, (rose violet
. buttercup)
is equivalent to (rose . (violet . buttercup))
.
The object looks like this:
--- --- --- --- | | |--> | | |--> buttercup --- --- --- --- | | | | --> rose --> violet
The syntax (rose . violet . buttercup)
is invalid because
there is nothing that it could mean. If anything, it would say to put
buttercup
in the cdr of a cons cell whose cdr is already
used for violet
.
The list (rose violet)
is equivalent to (rose . (violet))
,
and looks like this:
--- --- --- --- | | |--> | | |--> nil --- --- --- --- | | | | --> rose --> violet
Similarly, the three-element list (rose violet buttercup)
is equivalent to (rose . (violet . (buttercup)))
.
It looks like this:
--- --- --- --- --- --- | | |--> | | |--> | | |--> nil --- --- --- --- --- --- | | | | | | --> rose --> violet --> buttercup