Re: It's public: Bitstream doesn't envision an update to Vera
- From: "Denis Jacquerye" <moyogo gmail com>
- To: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas mailhot laposte net>
- Cc: Rob <veralist kudla org>, fonts gnome org
- Subject: Re: It's public: Bitstream doesn't envision an update to Vera
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:33:09 +0200
On 7/12/06, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas mailhot laposte net> wrote:
Le Mer 12 juillet 2006 16:17, Rob a écrit :
> On Wed July 12 2006 07:56, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> > I still use Toga on my own machines because
>> > I'm vain, but for other people I just tell them to install
>> > DejaVu and use the condensed variants.
>>
>> If you feel like doing fonts again, you have your place
>> reserved within the project (BTW is Toga metric-compatible
>> with Condensed DejaVu? Need to know if I can tell fontconfig
>> to substitute one for the other)
>
> I haven't looked, but if you guys used the "recipe" I posted back
> then (which I think was just using Fontforge to reduce the width
> to 90%) it should be valid. But obviously Toga never had all
> the glyphs Condensed DejaVu does, so any block of text that uses
> them will render differently in Toga.
I think it's not exactly 90% now but close enough so I'll do the
substitution rule for Toga
DejaVu Condensed fonts are shrunk 90% in width at the moment. We've
only had some discussion about using 87.5% as defined in the OT specs.
I don't think people would notice the difference anyway so we're
probably going to keep it at 90%. Changing the name to follow the
specs would make more sense if we ever plan to do more width variants.
Cheers,
Denis Moyogo Jacquerye
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]