9 Set Predicates
The goal
(%bag-of X G Bag)
unifies with Bag
the list of all instantiations of
X for which G succeeds. Thus, the following query
asks for all the things known —
> (%which (things-known) (%let (someone x) (%bag-of x (%knows someone x) things-known)))
'((things-known
TeX
Racket
Prolog
Penelope
TeX
Prolog
Odysseus
TeX
calculus
archery))
This is the only solution for this goal:
> (%more) #f
Note that some things —
> (%which (things-known) (%let (someone x) (%set-of x (%knows someone x) things-known))) '((things-known TeX Racket Prolog Penelope Odysseus calculus archery))
In the above, the free variable someone in the %knows-goal is used as if it were existentially quantified. In contrast, Prolog’s versions of %bag-of and %set-of fix it for each solution of the set-predicate goal. We can do it too with some additional syntax that identifies the free variable. Eg,
> (%which (someone things-known) (%let (x) (%bag-of x (%free-vars (someone) (%knows someone x)) things-known))) '((someone . Odysseus) (things-known TeX Racket Prolog Penelope))
The bag of things known by one someone is returned. That someone is Odysseus. The query can be retried for more solutions, each listing the things known by a different someone:
> (%more) '((someone . Penelope) (things-known TeX Prolog Odysseus))
> (%more) '((someone . Telemachus) (things-known TeX calculus))
> (%more) '((someone . Odysseus) (things-known archery))
> (%more) #f
Racklog also provides two variants of these set predicates, viz., %bag-of-1 and %set-of-1. These act like %bag-of and %set-of but fail if the resulting bag or set is empty.