HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME (Transact-SQL)

**APPLIES TO:** ![yes](media/yes.png)SQL Server (starting with 2008) ![yes](media/yes.png)Azure SQL Database ![no](media/no.png)Azure SQL Data Warehouse ![no](media/no.png)Parallel Data Warehouse

Evaluates the effective permission of the current user on a securable. A related function is fn_my_permissions.

Topic link icon Transact-SQL Syntax Conventions

Syntax

  
HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME ( securable , securable_class , permission    
    [ , sub-securable ] [ , sub-securable_class ] )

Arguments

securable
Is the name of the securable. If the securable is the server itself, this value should be set to NULL. securable is a scalar expression of type sysname. There is no default.

securable_class
Is the name of the class of securable against which the permission is tested. securable_class is a scalar expression of type nvarchar(60).

In Azure SQL Database the securable_class argument must be set to one of the following: DATABASE, OBJECT, ROLE, SCHEMA, or USER.

permission
A nonnull scalar expression of type sysname that represents the permission name to be checked. There is no default. The permission name ANY is a wildcard.

sub-securable
An optional scalar expression of type sysname that represents the name of the securable sub-entity against which the permission is tested. The default is NULL.

[!NOTE]
In versions of SQL Server through SQL Server SQL Server 2017 sub-securables cannot use brackets in the form ‘[sub name]’. Use ‘sub name’ instead.

sub-securable_class
An optional scalar expression of type nvarchar(60) that represent the class of securable subentity against which the permission is tested. The default is NULL.

In Azure SQL Database the sub-securable_class argument is valid only if the securable_class argument is set to OBJECT. If the securable_class argument is set to OBJECT, the sub-securable_class argument must be set to COLUMN.

Return Types

int

Returns NULL when the query fails.

Remarks

This built-in function tests whether the current principal has a particular effective permission on a specified securable. HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME returns 1 when the user has effective permission on the securable, 0 when the user has no effective permission on the securable, and NULL when the securable class or permission is not valid. An effective permission is any of the following:

A permission granted directly to the principal, and not denied.
A permission implied by a higher-level permission held by the principal and not denied.
A permission granted to a role or group of which the principal is a member, and not denied.
A permission held by a role or group of which the principal is a member, and not denied.

The permission evaluation is always performed in the security context of the caller. To determine whether some other user has an effective permission, the caller must have IMPERSONATE permission on that user.

For schema-level entities, one-, two-, or three-part nonnull names are accepted. For database-level entities a one-part name is accepted, with a null value meaning “current database”. For the server itself, a null value (meaning “current server”) is required. This function cannot check permissions on a linked server or on a Windows user for which no server-level principal has been created.

The following query will return a list of built-in securable classes:

SELECT class_desc FROM sys.fn_builtin_permissions(default);

The following collations are used:

Current database collation: Database-level securables that include securables not contained by a schema; one- or two-part schema-scoped securables; target database when using a three-part name.
master database collation: Server-level securables.
‘ANY’ is not supported for column-level checks. You must specify the appropriate permission.

Examples

A. Do I have the server-level VIEW SERVER STATE permission?

Applies to: SQL Server 2008 through SQL Server 2008 SQL Server 2017

SELECT HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME(null, null, 'VIEW SERVER STATE');

B. Am I able to IMPERSONATE server principal Ps?

Applies to: SQL Server 2008 through SQL Server 2008 SQL Server 2017

SELECT HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME('Ps', 'LOGIN', 'IMPERSONATE');

C. Do I have any permissions in the current database?

SELECT HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME(db_name(), 'DATABASE', 'ANY');

D. Does database principal Pd have any permission in the current database?

Assume caller has IMPERSONATE permission on principal Pd.

EXECUTE AS user = 'Pd'  
GO  
SELECT HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME(db_name(), 'DATABASE', 'ANY');  
GO  
REVERT;  
GO

E. Can I create procedures and tables in schema S?

The following example requires ALTER permission in S and CREATE PROCEDURE permission in the database, and similarly for tables.

SELECT HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME(db_name(), 'DATABASE', 'CREATE PROCEDURE')  
    & HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME('S', 'SCHEMA', 'ALTER') AS _can_create_procs,  
    HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME(db_name(), 'DATABASE', 'CREATE TABLE') &  
    HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME('S', 'SCHEMA', 'ALTER') AS _can_create_tables;

F. Which tables do I have SELECT permission on?

SELECT HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME  
(QUOTENAME(SCHEMA_NAME(schema_id)) + '.' + QUOTENAME(name),   
    'OBJECT', 'SELECT') AS have_select, * FROM sys.tables

G. Do I have INSERT permission on the SalesPerson table in AdventureWorks2012?

The following example assumes AdventureWorks2012 is my current database context, and uses a two-part name.

SELECT HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME('Sales.SalesPerson', 'OBJECT', 'INSERT');

The following example makes no assumptions about my current database context, and uses a three-part name.

SELECT HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME('AdventureWorks2012.Sales.SalesPerson',   
    'OBJECT', 'INSERT');

H. Which columns of table T do I have SELECT permission on?

SELECT name AS column_name,   
    HAS_PERMS_BY_NAME('T', 'OBJECT', 'SELECT', name, 'COLUMN')   
    AS can_select   
    FROM sys.columns AS c   
    WHERE c.object_id=object_id('T');